The general consensus on this is ‘don’t do it’. However, it
can easily be made to work, and it allows a much richer and better styled
content to be posted.
In a slight break from
my usual genealogy posts, I want to pass on some of my experiences with
blogger.com in case they help someone else. Depending on the feedback from this
one, I have further experiences that I may post.
The word blog was
formerly weblog (i.e. a contraction of ‘Web log’) and was coined by Jorn Barger
in December 1997[1]. The
original content of a blog was
commentary on Web links, or personal thoughts and essays. Contrary to recent
reports[2],
the blog is not dead; it has merely diversified. To understand how it has
diversified, we need to look at the essential structure of a blog.
A blog is basically a serialised
publication. Posts are made if-and-when the author(s) deem appropriate. The
blog URL address will take you to the latest post, although any previous post
can be revisited by using its specific URL address. Readers can subscribe in
order to get a notification when a new post appears, and they can usually
comment on posts to participate in some interaction with the author or other
readers.
This basic structure has allowed the blog to be applied far
beyond any concept of an online personal diary. Although many blogs are still
concerned with news items in the author’s field of interest, the concept of an
interactive serialised publication has found new uses such as advertising,
special interest micro-publications (e.g. cooking recipes, or car restoration
stages), blog fiction (i.e.
serialised publication of narrative chapters), and technical presentations (for
education, or for research and discussion).
The relevance of this bit of blog history and analysis is
that some uses require more care and attention to their preparation than
others. If your post is more than a few paragraphs, and you want to use a
specific layout, or include endnotes or source lists, then the formatting tools
provided by most blogs are too primitive. The longer you anticipate the
relevance of your post to be, then the more effort you will want to invest on
it. Yes, you can usually switch to editing raw HTML — as Blogger allows — but
that’s outside of the skill-set of most authors. Also, why bother if you have
access to a word-processor such as Microsoft Word.
So what is the issue with Microsoft Word? At first glance,
it appears trivially easy to copy-and-paste from your Word document into the
Blogger Compose window, and that was the route I used with my first few posts.
Unfortunately, when I added support to notify subscribers via email, using a
tool called feedburner, then it failed and no one was notified. Microsoft Word
generates a lot of tags that are specific to Microsoft Office and this has two
consequences: those Office-specific tags failed ‘validation’ by feedburner
because it didn’t understand them, and the sheer volume of these tags (many of
which are quite superfluous) regularly breaks a size limit within feedburner.
The consensus on Blogger forums is simply to “flatten” the
post by removing all Word formatting (e.g. by pasting it into a simple
text editor and copying it back), and then resurrect the formatting, as best
you can, using Blogger’s own features. If you’ve used Word deliberately in
order to craft a good presentation then this sort of help can be both
frustrating and annoying. The suggestion may even be impossible because, as
I’ve already indicated, Blogger’s features are more primitive as it’s not a
professional formatting tool.
So what’s the answer? When your Word version is ready to be
transferred, make sure you first save your definitive copy back to its native
*.doc(x) file. Then, go back to the Save-As dialog and scroll down the ‘Save as
type’ list to find the entry ‘Web Page, Filtered (*.htm, *.html)’. Save a
temporary copy in this format, say on your desktop so that it doesn’t conflict
with your master copy. Word will now be displaying an HTML version that has all
the Office-specific tags filtered out, and you can safely copy-and-paste from
what you see on your screen to the Blogger Compose window. When you’re done,
you can delete the temporary copy from your desktop.
This copy-and-paste does not transfer your images but that's
only a small issue. Your blog post will contain empty frames where your
pictures should be, but these can be removed and your original pictures
uploaded to Blogger and inserted at the correct position. The fidelity is
generally very good, although it’s always wise to look at a ‘Preview’ before
publishing a new post.
[1] Rebecca Blood, "Weblogs: A History and Perspective", Rebecca's Pocket, 7 Sep 2000 (http://www.rebeccablood.net/essays/weblog_history.html
: accessed 12 Jan 2014).
[2] Jason Kottke, "The blog is dead, long live the blog", Nieman Journalism Lab, 19 Dec 2013
(http://www.niemanlab.org/2013/12/the-blog-is-dead/ : accessed 12 Jan 2014).
I've been copying and pasting text from MSW to Blogger, which may explain why many of my published posts end up ruined days after they have been published. The paragraph spaces broaden and citations are no longer evenly spaced. This happens if I simply change the publishing date while editing a post or after it's been published.
ReplyDeleteDid you try it as per this blog-post Marian? A normal copy-and-paste includes all the superfluous HTML that Word uses.
Delete